Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Reader Questions

From flotsom23: Why doesn’t your blog have any kind of discernible theme?

Thanks for the questions “flotsom23″! First of all, if I had to answer your question, I’d probably spend a lot of time tapping my head, inflating my mouth with air and then letting it out again, and frowning. Pretty much pretending like I care about your question, when I really just didn’t know what “discernible” meant. Secondly, I think we should take time this holiday season to think about the least among us. People who desperately need our help, like homeless people, baby sea-turtles, and anime fans (srsly!).

Duck Sewp

was duck here - looked like flag

Stare at this for three minutes, then look at a white sheet of paper; you'll see pan-seared foie gras.

Salon.com recently published an interesting little piece on patriotic duck decorations which devolved into a discussion of a Humane Society lawsuit against Hudson Valley Foie Gras. My first reaction was disgust. I mean, why can’t we keep interior design apolitical? I know that our “Founding Fathers” were into all that politics stuff. It’s as American as apple pie and jingoism. But we need to sterilize things like home decor, food, toilet seats, and skate-punks. 

Eventually, I got over it. Yet, as I read on about legislation to ban foie gras, I could not let this passage be: 

“unclear who the real losers in this battle are — consumers, foie gras farmers or the ducks themselves.” 

The ducks? Numero uno, the Oregon Ducks will most certainly loose to the Buckeyes in the Rose Bowl, regardless of foie gras prohibition. Numero two, what duck in his right mind would oppose this legislation. How can Salon say that ducks would be the losers in a battle to reduce the ways people can eat them? Well, sure enough, after interviewing a number of local Mallards, there are some who oppose this measure. 

One young duck, who didn’t speak very good English (another check against the American education system), indicated that “Quack Quack liberty bell Quack.” I’m not really sure what to make of that. 

Another older male duck suggested that ” the economic parity of competing demographics typically mediates any challenges to existing legislative precedent. However, enaction could result in some fiduciary transfer, especially our direction.” I wasn’t sure what to make of that either. 

Looking for more clarification, I approached a sleeping, dirty swan. After fending off his violent attacks, calmly assuring him that I did not want to steal his cygnets, he told me that my responses were colored by “Mallards’ general lack of interest in the plight of ‘agriculturally bound’ poultry.” Logically then, ducks still don’t lose if this legislation passes. Mallards hold a neutral position, and dirty swans remain objectively hostile to bloggers. 

Final Analysis: I would like to recommend a truce for all parties, by suggesting a new foie gras source: 

was oregon duck here

I know some "college interns" from Ohio that would gladly harvest it for free.

First of all, the “well-meaning” folks at “David Horowitz NewsReal” (DHNR) tried to slide this XKCD comic off as their own, in their “Lunch Break Series” (LBS). And for that, they should be ashamed. It sets them up for an easy attack from the Left, as XKCD’s stick figures have an easy appeal to Obamanatzi Healthcare Bandits (OHBs). In art (read: pictures that liberals buy), stark lines and anthropomorphic forms are associated with linear, childish, and statistic free thinking. The science based humor in this comic is particularly troubling. This art represents “everything that is wrong with America” (ETIWWA). XKCD’s simplistic stick figures are a mark of low intelligence and trickery. It is often the dumbest who are the cleverest, don’t you think?

However, DHNR struck an earlier blow to OHBdom when it posted this non-XKCD antiatrocity in LBS:

DHNR gave full credit to this artist, reiterating its “non-liberalness and passion for pastels” (NLAPFP). I can hear the OHBs grinding their teeth, or free-trade coffee beans, over this!

In another effort to defeat ETIWWA, the artist shows his NLAPFP stripes by creating the “shortest artist’s statement in history” (SASIH):

“Contradictory perspectives and ambiguous relationships create excitement and tension in our lives. I paint this.” Adding that, “Less is more.”

I have to say I was inspired by this SASIH of a non-OHB of NLAPFP to demonstrate the inferiority of XKCD and ETIWWA as linked in LBS. So here’s my SASIH:

Contradictory perspectives and ambiguous arguments create excrement. I blog this.

Final Analysis: Ah, less is SO much more. Plus, I overloaded my socialist spellchecker, which is alway trying to regulate my…uh, spelling…and unplug grandma!

Blogical Fallacies

According to the high socialist macaque priests of WordPress, on December 1, 2009, this blog post was featured under “Humor.” If that’s the case, then you’d have to call this blog post “brain science.” I realize that the recipe for humor requires: 

1/2 cup Easy Target 

tbsp. Politics 

1/4 cup Pop Culture Reference 

Fist full o’ sarcasm (though anger or pistachios may be substituted). 

For instance: Why did Katie Couric disappear on the set of Sesame St.? Because Sara Palin told the puppets her name was “Cookie Couric.” Ha! Ha! Did you spot the “Easy Target”? It was you, when you thought it’d be funny! The “Politics,” of course, appear in my clever reference to the violent potential of literal-minded puppets. 

was cookie here

"Weird cookie put up fight...and taste like the letter T and the number 5!"

 

Anyhoosier, my real beef is with “Blogic” and the way it alters reality. In my opinion, we ought to leave that job to drugs. 

Here’s how it works, in formal terms: Even if Q is clearly not P, Q = P if Q is defined as P. Therefore, P = Nothing. 

In less formal terms, if I tag a post as ”Humor,” even though it clearly deals with Terrorism (which isn’t funny, even if their attack involves lighting farts),  Hezbollah announcements (which are sort of like your child’s first words: attention grabbing only because they’re non-sequitor, and cute!) or Charlie Sheen (uh…did you know that in Two and a Half Men, he is actually the 1/2), laced with vague undercurrents of libertarianism, it will be thought of as “Humor.” WordPress will feature it and call it “Humor.” Then I will write a blog post about it. Unintentionally giving it more publicity. It’s a vicious cycle, and I have been afraid of cycles ever since I spent the night in a washing machine on the Seattle Spaceneedle with a whirling dervish in my arms. What a night! Oh, and the word “Humor” loses its meaning. 

Final Analysis: All manner of physics warping equivalencies are now possible: we might as well consider Carrot Top funny. No, that would never be true. Nevermind. [Did you spot the Easy Target? It was you again! Or, maybe, Carrot Top...that poor, sad, sad thing.]

Turducken: Ponderables #5

Personally, I think that ‘turd’ucken is a culinary travesty. But what’s even worse is the horrific suffering that this poor animal must endure while it’s alive.

Adam Lambert:

After a surprisingly not shocking and undersexualized prime-time performance, Adam Lambert, a Vampire from Stephanie Meyer’s newest Twilight film, completely drained the body of  The View host Elizabeth Hasselbeck, which was never believed to contain human blood to begin with, and re-filled it with Sunny D.

Barack Obama:

While pushing his new healthcare plan, Barack Obama, went without sleep for 30 hours on the set of Two and a Half Men, trying to bribe Charlie Sheen and Lady Gaga with American Patriots and Golden Freedom, so they would play Poison Ivy and Batman, respectively, in the up coming production of Chicago, live on Broadway.

Black Friday:

After being pardoned by Barack Obama, the official Whitehouse Thanksgiving turkey pulled himself up by his bootstraps and joined Glenn Beck on a socialist gymnastics team in skimpy clothing, in order that Bud Light of the Holy American Music Awards would be protected from the Axis of Evil: China, Taco Bell’s Black Jack Taco, Shopping, and Portuguese Water Dogs.

Final Analysis: I know I’m shameless. And that is why I sincerely appologize to anyone who was offended, or convinced, by my attempts to Crash the State Dinner by dressing up as Jon Stewart, of Grey’s Anatomy fame, so I could take a picture of a Big Bank Bailout on my iPhone and send it to Santa Claus Holiday Dinner Menus. I am of peace, always.

Back to the Gammon Bored

As you know, dear readers, many of the most exciting children’s games began as a warnings against hanging out with ugly people, and foreigners. We need only look back to the nuclear age to discover one of your personal childhood favorites: “Ring Around the Rosey.”
“Wait,” you say, “doesn’t that have its origins in plague-stricken England.” Well, first of all, this is my blog and I wait for no one. If you can’t keep up, well, you’re an illiterate boob. Secondly, you are clearly Irish or something.
there was a cute picture here

There'll be no "Ring Around the Rosey" for you mister...until you clean up your mess.

 With all the newly evacuated, so-called, “Brownfields” in Japan and places in the U.S. of A., like the New Mexican desert and Pittsburg, and the surplus of bland 1950’s children, entrepreneurs saw a way to make money by combining the two. They turned these toxic waste sites areas of low vegetation and non-potable water into Magical Learning-grounds!™

Teacher: “Look children, a three eyed fish!”

Ignorant Child: “Why does it have its intestines outside its body?”

Teacher: “How the hell do you know what ‘intestines’ means?!…I mean, here child, drink some water…”

"Ashes, ashes, we all play in a nuclear blast site!"

 Over the years, the lyrics to “Ring Around the Rosie” have changed, but children have always held hands while running around a glowing mudclod. Especially the dim ones.

This brings me to “Backgammon” (there’s no good segue to this), a game young children hate. Just as much as they hate dental visits, broccoli, and cleaning up after their alcoholic parents. There’s good news though; we can solve this problem with “information” (the Backgammon problem, not the alcoholic parents problem – sorry kids!).

Before the advent of nuclear war, people had trouble coming up with stuff to do. But after several thousand years of trial and error, they decided to stick with error.

The curious countenance, the bloodshot eyes, and the yellow mustard-stache. Notice the signs of genius? No, me neither.

Enter Hans Gammon, the inventor of “Triangles, Circles, Numbers, and Racoons.” It was wisely retitled after his death, against his wishes. Here’s how you play:

1.) Find an empty table. No empty table? Try the floor. No floor? Where are you? Outside? You heathen.

2.) Just add water! Just kidding – add 30 checkers, four die, a doubling die (you know…for kids), and a board covered with triangles and a bar in the middle.

3.) Oh! I almost forgot, you also need a caged rabies infected raccoon. If you don’t have a raccoon, a beaver with bad breath will work.

D.) Now, place all your checkers on the table, or “flatwood” as the Brits call it. Roll to see who goes first…then that person rolls the dice to determine the number of moves.

0.) I know what you’re thinking now, seems pretty intuitive. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong! Oh, dear Lord, you don’t know how wrong you are! Roll two sixes? Move 24 times. Roll a five and a six? Time to get the doubling die!

10.)Doubling die: using an unnecessarily obscure mathematical process (multiplication) a player “ups the odds” or, as I say, “increase the risk.” Player one rolls a five and six, and the first of the two players to grab the doubling die gets to roll it. The other player will use the rolled number to determine how many times he has to stick his hands in the raccoon cage.

Zucchini.) The first player to get all of his checkers off the board, and doesn’t have rabies, wins.

Final Analysis: I realize, however belatedly, that this was probably not very convincing. Also, using a beaver with bad breath is not actually an option in tournament play.

Is your mechanical analog number connecter giving you grief? Your problem may be simpler than you think. Your watch maybe experiencing Torsion Field Physics.

Symptoms include: mechanical parts, graphical interface, inexplicable (under ordinary circumstances) high velocity electrostatic aftershock, burning smell, a wire connecting it to an outdated laptop, and vomiting (you, not the watch).

The cure? It’s simple. Consult your local amature physicist, and ask them if Pseudoscience is for you. He (always a he) may ask you to wander around Mayan temples, Egyptian pyramids, and scream incoherently at “the ignorant masses.”

Final Analysis: I’ve found that if I connect my television to my toaster, and turn them on simultaneously, all the lights in my house go out. Clearly, this is just another instance of magnified intelligence fields interacting with subatomic refrigerator gnomes.

I may be an Ohianer, but I cannot abide what British Columbia is doing to gut the arts. I raise my fist in burning anger!

Does anyone know how to put out a grease fire?

 

Final Analysis: “Mommy give me some pancakes!”

scary witch here

Oh No! Don't eat my face! Ma'am.

Listen up Horror Freaks, and Regular Freaks, you have to go rent the one of the best horror films in recent memory, Drag Me to Hell. That is, my recent memory, which has been severely impaired by my consumption of mercury laden fish. You see, tuna just tastes better when its had time to set in a really good chemical marinade (see Atlantic Coast). From what I recall anyway, this was an averagely decent, for a terrible movie.

Here’s the plot synopsis: a young woman, just trying to make her way in the world of business, is cursed by an old woman with slimy teeth. This curse involves sucking face with said woman, funny shadows, and being drug to hell. (Is that the right form of “drag”?) Somewhere along the way, she discovers that the only way to  get rid of the curse is to sacrifice an animal. Her first reaction is a shrieking revelation that, “I’m a vegetarian!”  So, as I imaging any vegetarian would, she reaches for a chef’s knife and her cat. Her sacrifice manual suggested a goat or chicken, but beloved pets work too. Don’t fret though; Mr. Fuzzy Pants returns later when the old woman vomits him onto our young protagonist. I really can’t make this stuff up.

Luckily, for all of you who missed this life-changing cinematic cat-astrophy (yuk, yuk), there is a sequel: Drag Me to Drag Me to Hell. In this film, a young woman, just trying to make her way to a decent movie, is cursed by teenager with greasy hair. This curse involves sucking face with said teenager, awkward conversation, and being drug to Drag Me to Hell. You will be terrified as you see the phony skate-punk convince her that “Yeah, it’s supposed to be really good.” You will also be challenged, or metaphysically disfigured, by the movie’s startlingly postmodern plot. A “demonic horde” of movie theatre employees (redundant, I know) converts her ticket with the help of a ”ghost” inside the ticket kiosk. Finally, a fiery crack opens in the floor of the violently shaking  theatre lobby, and a shadowy hand gently places her in her seat. The skate-punk has disappeared into a nearby alley to, uh, skate and be a punk I guess.

 
 
 

A young Donald Trump?

Oh No! Don't hang out in front of the local mall and avoid eye contact with adults! Punk.

 

Final Analysis: I don’t usually subcontract my Final Analyses. However, Ebert put it best when he said “Drag Me to Hell was so good, I  gouged out both of my eyes and dashed my brains out on a rock.” Okay, he didn’t say that. He wrote it because he doesn’t have a lower jaw.

Happy Halloween!

Older Posts »